Review



np68 peptide  (InvivoGen)


Bioz Verified Symbol InvivoGen is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol InvivoGen manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    InvivoGen np68 peptide
    Phenotypic and transcriptional differences of memory CD8 + T cells generated after a viral or a tumoral challenge Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with <t>VV-NP68</t> (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A) Viral load was measured in the lung by qPCR, or tumor volume (mm 3 ) was assessed by measuring its length, width, and thickness over time. (B) The number of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was determined over time in the blood by flow cytometry. (C and D) The expression of Ki67 (C) and Bcl2 (D) by Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was measured over time in the blood. (E) The phenotype of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was analyzed 31 days after infection in the spleen, and the percentages of cells expressing each marker are represented as a heatmap. The statistical significance of differences was determined using a two-way ANOVA (C–E) (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001). Data are represented as mean ± SD and are representative of 3 independent experiments ( n = 5 to 10 mice per group). (F–I) 60 days after immunization, naive F5 and Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells were single-cell sorted, and stimulated with NP68 peptide (10 nM) for 2 h or left untreated. The transcriptome was analyzed by scRNAseq ( n = 476 cells). (F) Clustering of cells projected on a UMAP colored by populations. (G) Proportion of sorted populations in each cluster. (H and I) Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes between quiescent (H) or restimulated (I) Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + .
    Np68 Peptide, supplied by InvivoGen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1337 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/np68 peptide/product/InvivoGen
    Average 96 stars, based on 1337 article reviews
    np68 peptide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Transient tumor exposure induces persistent functional defects in memory CD8 + T cells"

    Article Title: Transient tumor exposure induces persistent functional defects in memory CD8 + T cells

    Journal: iScience

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115556

    Phenotypic and transcriptional differences of memory CD8 + T cells generated after a viral or a tumoral challenge Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A) Viral load was measured in the lung by qPCR, or tumor volume (mm 3 ) was assessed by measuring its length, width, and thickness over time. (B) The number of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was determined over time in the blood by flow cytometry. (C and D) The expression of Ki67 (C) and Bcl2 (D) by Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was measured over time in the blood. (E) The phenotype of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was analyzed 31 days after infection in the spleen, and the percentages of cells expressing each marker are represented as a heatmap. The statistical significance of differences was determined using a two-way ANOVA (C–E) (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001). Data are represented as mean ± SD and are representative of 3 independent experiments ( n = 5 to 10 mice per group). (F–I) 60 days after immunization, naive F5 and Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells were single-cell sorted, and stimulated with NP68 peptide (10 nM) for 2 h or left untreated. The transcriptome was analyzed by scRNAseq ( n = 476 cells). (F) Clustering of cells projected on a UMAP colored by populations. (G) Proportion of sorted populations in each cluster. (H and I) Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes between quiescent (H) or restimulated (I) Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + .
    Figure Legend Snippet: Phenotypic and transcriptional differences of memory CD8 + T cells generated after a viral or a tumoral challenge Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A) Viral load was measured in the lung by qPCR, or tumor volume (mm 3 ) was assessed by measuring its length, width, and thickness over time. (B) The number of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was determined over time in the blood by flow cytometry. (C and D) The expression of Ki67 (C) and Bcl2 (D) by Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was measured over time in the blood. (E) The phenotype of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was analyzed 31 days after infection in the spleen, and the percentages of cells expressing each marker are represented as a heatmap. The statistical significance of differences was determined using a two-way ANOVA (C–E) (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001). Data are represented as mean ± SD and are representative of 3 independent experiments ( n = 5 to 10 mice per group). (F–I) 60 days after immunization, naive F5 and Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells were single-cell sorted, and stimulated with NP68 peptide (10 nM) for 2 h or left untreated. The transcriptome was analyzed by scRNAseq ( n = 476 cells). (F) Clustering of cells projected on a UMAP colored by populations. (G) Proportion of sorted populations in each cluster. (H and I) Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes between quiescent (H) or restimulated (I) Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + .

    Techniques Used: Generated, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Infection, Marker, Single Cell

    Tum-CD8 + memory cells express molecules associated with T cell exhaustion Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A and B) The expression of PD-1, TIM-3, CD9, and Gal3 was measured at the surface of CD8 + memory cells at 30 dpi by flow cytometry. (C and D) The expression of Gal3 was measured intracellularly in memory CD8 + T cells at 30 dpi by flow cytometry. (E) At 30 dpi, splenocytes were stimulated with NP68 peptide (10 nM) for 4 h, and the expression of PD-1, TIM-3, or intracellular Gal3 by memory CD8 + T cells was measured by flow cytometry. The statistical significance of differences was determined using the Mann-Whitney test (B and D) or two-way ANOVA (E) (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 3 independent experiments.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Tum-CD8 + memory cells express molecules associated with T cell exhaustion Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A and B) The expression of PD-1, TIM-3, CD9, and Gal3 was measured at the surface of CD8 + memory cells at 30 dpi by flow cytometry. (C and D) The expression of Gal3 was measured intracellularly in memory CD8 + T cells at 30 dpi by flow cytometry. (E) At 30 dpi, splenocytes were stimulated with NP68 peptide (10 nM) for 4 h, and the expression of PD-1, TIM-3, or intracellular Gal3 by memory CD8 + T cells was measured by flow cytometry. The statistical significance of differences was determined using the Mann-Whitney test (B and D) or two-way ANOVA (E) (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 3 independent experiments.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, MANN-WHITNEY

    Tum-CD8 + memory cells display altered cytokine production but not cytotoxic capacities compared to Vir-CD8 + memory cells Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A and B) At 30 dpi, F5 memory cells were restimulated with NP68 (10 nM) for 4h in the presence of GolgiStop. The production of IFNγ, TNF, and IL-2 was measured by flow cytometry and expressed in % of total F5 (A) or MFI within the cytokine+ cells (B). (C and D) At 30 dpi, F5 memory cells were restimulated with NP68 (10 nM) for 4h in the presence (cytokines) or absence (CD69) of GolgiStop. The production of IFNγ and TNF and the upregulation of CD69 were measured by flow cytometry over time and expressed in % (C) or MFI (D). (E) The production of IFNγ was measured in supernatant after 4 or 24h of stimulation. (F and G) At 30 dpi, F5 memory cells were restimulated with various doses of NP68 for 4h in the presence of GolgiStop, and the production of IFNγ and TNF was measured by flow cytometry (F). EC 50 was determined (G). (H and I) Splenocytes were incubated with NP68 (10 nM) or control medium for 2h and labeled with CTV or CFSE, respectively. A 1:1 ratio of NP68-loaded splenocytes: control splenocytes (2.10 6 cells) was injected i.v. in Tum-CD8 + or Vir-CD8 + challenged mice at the memory stage. Representative histograms depicting control and CTV-labeled NP68-loaded splenocytes are shown (H). The percentage of NP68-loaded splenocytes killed was evaluated at 6-, 16-, or 44-h post-transfer (I). (J)Total CD8 + enriched from Tum-CD8 + or Vir-CD8 + challenged mice were labeled with CTV and stimulated with NP68-loaded DCs (1:1 ratio) for 4 days in the presence of IL-2. The expansion index of F5 cells was determined after 4 days. The statistical significance of differences was determined using 2-way ANOVA (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.0001). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 3 independent (A–G) or 1 (H–J) experiment(s).
    Figure Legend Snippet: Tum-CD8 + memory cells display altered cytokine production but not cytotoxic capacities compared to Vir-CD8 + memory cells Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A and B) At 30 dpi, F5 memory cells were restimulated with NP68 (10 nM) for 4h in the presence of GolgiStop. The production of IFNγ, TNF, and IL-2 was measured by flow cytometry and expressed in % of total F5 (A) or MFI within the cytokine+ cells (B). (C and D) At 30 dpi, F5 memory cells were restimulated with NP68 (10 nM) for 4h in the presence (cytokines) or absence (CD69) of GolgiStop. The production of IFNγ and TNF and the upregulation of CD69 were measured by flow cytometry over time and expressed in % (C) or MFI (D). (E) The production of IFNγ was measured in supernatant after 4 or 24h of stimulation. (F and G) At 30 dpi, F5 memory cells were restimulated with various doses of NP68 for 4h in the presence of GolgiStop, and the production of IFNγ and TNF was measured by flow cytometry (F). EC 50 was determined (G). (H and I) Splenocytes were incubated with NP68 (10 nM) or control medium for 2h and labeled with CTV or CFSE, respectively. A 1:1 ratio of NP68-loaded splenocytes: control splenocytes (2.10 6 cells) was injected i.v. in Tum-CD8 + or Vir-CD8 + challenged mice at the memory stage. Representative histograms depicting control and CTV-labeled NP68-loaded splenocytes are shown (H). The percentage of NP68-loaded splenocytes killed was evaluated at 6-, 16-, or 44-h post-transfer (I). (J)Total CD8 + enriched from Tum-CD8 + or Vir-CD8 + challenged mice were labeled with CTV and stimulated with NP68-loaded DCs (1:1 ratio) for 4 days in the presence of IL-2. The expansion index of F5 cells was determined after 4 days. The statistical significance of differences was determined using 2-way ANOVA (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.0001). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 3 independent (A–G) or 1 (H–J) experiment(s).

    Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Control, Labeling, Injection

    A transient tumoral challenge is sufficient to alter the protection capacity of F5 memory cells Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A–D) At 30 dpi, Vir- or Tum-challenged mice were infected with VV-NP68 (2.10 5 pfu). Six days after infection, mice received an i.v. injection of anti-CD8 antibody, and the proportion of cells within the tissue and the vasculature of the lung was determined (A). The proportion of memory CD8 + T cells in the lung tissue among all memory CD8 + T cells was determined (B). The expression of CD49a (C) and CD49d (D) was measured on memory CD8 + T cells within the lung tissue and vasculature. (E) At 30 dpi, Vir- or Tum-challenged mice were infected with Flu-NP68 (5.10 4 TCID50), and the weight loss was followed for 6 days. (F) At 30 dpi, Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + memory cells were FACS-sorted and transferred into B6 host (1,2.10 5 cells, i.v. route). One day after transfer, mice received a lethal dose of Flu-NP68 (2.10 6 TCID 50), and survival was followed for 10 days. The statistical significance of differences was determined with 1-way (B) or 2-way (C–E) ANOVA test (∗ p > 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001), or log rank test (F). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 2 (A–D, and G) or 1 (E and F) experiment(s).
    Figure Legend Snippet: A transient tumoral challenge is sufficient to alter the protection capacity of F5 memory cells Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A–D) At 30 dpi, Vir- or Tum-challenged mice were infected with VV-NP68 (2.10 5 pfu). Six days after infection, mice received an i.v. injection of anti-CD8 antibody, and the proportion of cells within the tissue and the vasculature of the lung was determined (A). The proportion of memory CD8 + T cells in the lung tissue among all memory CD8 + T cells was determined (B). The expression of CD49a (C) and CD49d (D) was measured on memory CD8 + T cells within the lung tissue and vasculature. (E) At 30 dpi, Vir- or Tum-challenged mice were infected with Flu-NP68 (5.10 4 TCID50), and the weight loss was followed for 6 days. (F) At 30 dpi, Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + memory cells were FACS-sorted and transferred into B6 host (1,2.10 5 cells, i.v. route). One day after transfer, mice received a lethal dose of Flu-NP68 (2.10 6 TCID 50), and survival was followed for 10 days. The statistical significance of differences was determined with 1-way (B) or 2-way (C–E) ANOVA test (∗ p > 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001), or log rank test (F). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 2 (A–D, and G) or 1 (E and F) experiment(s).

    Techniques Used: Infection, Injection, Expressing

    Phenotype and cytokine production capacity of F5 memory cells is conserved after homologous or heterologous recall (A) Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). At 26 dpi, mice received a second immunization with VV-NP68 or EL4-NP68. (B) Thirty-one days post-recall, the number of F5 cells was measured in the spleen. (C) The expression of CD9, CD43, CD49a, and CD49d was measured on F5 memory cells 31 days after recall by flow cytometry. (D and E) Splenocytes were stimulated with NP68 (10 nM) for 4h in the presence (D) or absence (E) of GolgiStop. (D) The production of IFNγ, TFNα, and IL-2 was measured by flow cytometry. (E) The expression of PD-1 and TIM3 on F5 memory cells was determined in the spleen. The statistical significance of differences was determined with 1-way (B and C) or 2-way (D and E) ANOVA test (∗ p > 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 2 independent experiments.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Phenotype and cytokine production capacity of F5 memory cells is conserved after homologous or heterologous recall (A) Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). At 26 dpi, mice received a second immunization with VV-NP68 or EL4-NP68. (B) Thirty-one days post-recall, the number of F5 cells was measured in the spleen. (C) The expression of CD9, CD43, CD49a, and CD49d was measured on F5 memory cells 31 days after recall by flow cytometry. (D and E) Splenocytes were stimulated with NP68 (10 nM) for 4h in the presence (D) or absence (E) of GolgiStop. (D) The production of IFNγ, TFNα, and IL-2 was measured by flow cytometry. (E) The expression of PD-1 and TIM3 on F5 memory cells was determined in the spleen. The statistical significance of differences was determined with 1-way (B and C) or 2-way (D and E) ANOVA test (∗ p > 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 2 independent experiments.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Flow Cytometry



    Similar Products

    96
    InvivoGen np68 peptide
    Phenotypic and transcriptional differences of memory CD8 + T cells generated after a viral or a tumoral challenge Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with <t>VV-NP68</t> (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A) Viral load was measured in the lung by qPCR, or tumor volume (mm 3 ) was assessed by measuring its length, width, and thickness over time. (B) The number of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was determined over time in the blood by flow cytometry. (C and D) The expression of Ki67 (C) and Bcl2 (D) by Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was measured over time in the blood. (E) The phenotype of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was analyzed 31 days after infection in the spleen, and the percentages of cells expressing each marker are represented as a heatmap. The statistical significance of differences was determined using a two-way ANOVA (C–E) (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001). Data are represented as mean ± SD and are representative of 3 independent experiments ( n = 5 to 10 mice per group). (F–I) 60 days after immunization, naive F5 and Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells were single-cell sorted, and stimulated with NP68 peptide (10 nM) for 2 h or left untreated. The transcriptome was analyzed by scRNAseq ( n = 476 cells). (F) Clustering of cells projected on a UMAP colored by populations. (G) Proportion of sorted populations in each cluster. (H and I) Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes between quiescent (H) or restimulated (I) Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + .
    Np68 Peptide, supplied by InvivoGen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/np68 peptide/product/InvivoGen
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    np68 peptide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cambridge Bioscience peptide asnenmdam (np68)
    Phenotypic and transcriptional differences of memory CD8 + T cells generated after a viral or a tumoral challenge Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with <t>VV-NP68</t> (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A) Viral load was measured in the lung by qPCR, or tumor volume (mm 3 ) was assessed by measuring its length, width, and thickness over time. (B) The number of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was determined over time in the blood by flow cytometry. (C and D) The expression of Ki67 (C) and Bcl2 (D) by Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was measured over time in the blood. (E) The phenotype of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was analyzed 31 days after infection in the spleen, and the percentages of cells expressing each marker are represented as a heatmap. The statistical significance of differences was determined using a two-way ANOVA (C–E) (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001). Data are represented as mean ± SD and are representative of 3 independent experiments ( n = 5 to 10 mice per group). (F–I) 60 days after immunization, naive F5 and Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells were single-cell sorted, and stimulated with NP68 peptide (10 nM) for 2 h or left untreated. The transcriptome was analyzed by scRNAseq ( n = 476 cells). (F) Clustering of cells projected on a UMAP colored by populations. (G) Proportion of sorted populations in each cluster. (H and I) Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes between quiescent (H) or restimulated (I) Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + .
    Peptide Asnenmdam (Np68), supplied by Cambridge Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/peptide asnenmdam (np68)/product/Cambridge Bioscience
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    peptide asnenmdam (np68) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    AnaSpec np68 peptide 366-374

    Np68 Peptide 366 374, supplied by AnaSpec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/np68 peptide 366-374/product/AnaSpec
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    np68 peptide 366-374 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    AnaSpec asnenmdam (np68 peptide 366-374)

    Asnenmdam (Np68 Peptide 366 374), supplied by AnaSpec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/asnenmdam (np68 peptide 366-374)/product/AnaSpec
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    asnenmdam (np68 peptide 366-374) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Mimotopes np68 peptide influenza np366-374

    Np68 Peptide Influenza Np366 374, supplied by Mimotopes, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/np68 peptide influenza np366-374/product/Mimotopes
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    np68 peptide influenza np366-374 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Proimmune np68 peptide

    Np68 Peptide, supplied by Proimmune, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/np68 peptide/product/Proimmune
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    np68 peptide - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    American Peptide Company Inc f5 tcr 366 asnenmdam 374 ligand peptide 68 (np68)
    CD8 T lymphocytes from TCR-Tg F5 mice were stimulated with <t>NP68</t> peptide in the absence or presence of Treg cells. Tregs were purified from spleens of untreated or GX15-070-treated C57BL/6 mice. Proliferation of CD8 cells was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation. CD4+/CD25+/FoxP3+ phenotype of Tregs was confirmed by flow cytometry.
    F5 Tcr 366 Asnenmdam 374 Ligand Peptide 68 (Np68), supplied by American Peptide Company Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/f5 tcr 366 asnenmdam 374 ligand peptide 68 (np68)/product/American Peptide Company Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    f5 tcr 366 asnenmdam 374 ligand peptide 68 (np68) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Proimmune synthetic peptide np68
    CD8 T lymphocytes from TCR-Tg F5 mice were stimulated with <t>NP68</t> peptide in the absence or presence of Treg cells. Tregs were purified from spleens of untreated or GX15-070-treated C57BL/6 mice. Proliferation of CD8 cells was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation. CD4+/CD25+/FoxP3+ phenotype of Tregs was confirmed by flow cytometry.
    Synthetic Peptide Np68, supplied by Proimmune, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/synthetic peptide np68/product/Proimmune
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    synthetic peptide np68 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Phenotypic and transcriptional differences of memory CD8 + T cells generated after a viral or a tumoral challenge Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A) Viral load was measured in the lung by qPCR, or tumor volume (mm 3 ) was assessed by measuring its length, width, and thickness over time. (B) The number of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was determined over time in the blood by flow cytometry. (C and D) The expression of Ki67 (C) and Bcl2 (D) by Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was measured over time in the blood. (E) The phenotype of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was analyzed 31 days after infection in the spleen, and the percentages of cells expressing each marker are represented as a heatmap. The statistical significance of differences was determined using a two-way ANOVA (C–E) (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001). Data are represented as mean ± SD and are representative of 3 independent experiments ( n = 5 to 10 mice per group). (F–I) 60 days after immunization, naive F5 and Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells were single-cell sorted, and stimulated with NP68 peptide (10 nM) for 2 h or left untreated. The transcriptome was analyzed by scRNAseq ( n = 476 cells). (F) Clustering of cells projected on a UMAP colored by populations. (G) Proportion of sorted populations in each cluster. (H and I) Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes between quiescent (H) or restimulated (I) Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + .

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Transient tumor exposure induces persistent functional defects in memory CD8 + T cells

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115556

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Phenotypic and transcriptional differences of memory CD8 + T cells generated after a viral or a tumoral challenge Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A) Viral load was measured in the lung by qPCR, or tumor volume (mm 3 ) was assessed by measuring its length, width, and thickness over time. (B) The number of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was determined over time in the blood by flow cytometry. (C and D) The expression of Ki67 (C) and Bcl2 (D) by Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was measured over time in the blood. (E) The phenotype of Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells was analyzed 31 days after infection in the spleen, and the percentages of cells expressing each marker are represented as a heatmap. The statistical significance of differences was determined using a two-way ANOVA (C–E) (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001). Data are represented as mean ± SD and are representative of 3 independent experiments ( n = 5 to 10 mice per group). (F–I) 60 days after immunization, naive F5 and Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + cells were single-cell sorted, and stimulated with NP68 peptide (10 nM) for 2 h or left untreated. The transcriptome was analyzed by scRNAseq ( n = 476 cells). (F) Clustering of cells projected on a UMAP colored by populations. (G) Proportion of sorted populations in each cluster. (H and I) Volcano plot of the differentially expressed genes between quiescent (H) or restimulated (I) Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + .

    Article Snippet: After 7 days, NP68 peptide (20 nM) and CpG ODN 1826 (2 mg/mL, InvivoGen, tlrl-1826) were added to the BMDC and cultured overnight before being washed and used for CD8 + T cells activation.

    Techniques: Generated, Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Infection, Marker, Single Cell

    Tum-CD8 + memory cells express molecules associated with T cell exhaustion Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A and B) The expression of PD-1, TIM-3, CD9, and Gal3 was measured at the surface of CD8 + memory cells at 30 dpi by flow cytometry. (C and D) The expression of Gal3 was measured intracellularly in memory CD8 + T cells at 30 dpi by flow cytometry. (E) At 30 dpi, splenocytes were stimulated with NP68 peptide (10 nM) for 4 h, and the expression of PD-1, TIM-3, or intracellular Gal3 by memory CD8 + T cells was measured by flow cytometry. The statistical significance of differences was determined using the Mann-Whitney test (B and D) or two-way ANOVA (E) (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 3 independent experiments.

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Transient tumor exposure induces persistent functional defects in memory CD8 + T cells

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115556

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Tum-CD8 + memory cells express molecules associated with T cell exhaustion Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A and B) The expression of PD-1, TIM-3, CD9, and Gal3 was measured at the surface of CD8 + memory cells at 30 dpi by flow cytometry. (C and D) The expression of Gal3 was measured intracellularly in memory CD8 + T cells at 30 dpi by flow cytometry. (E) At 30 dpi, splenocytes were stimulated with NP68 peptide (10 nM) for 4 h, and the expression of PD-1, TIM-3, or intracellular Gal3 by memory CD8 + T cells was measured by flow cytometry. The statistical significance of differences was determined using the Mann-Whitney test (B and D) or two-way ANOVA (E) (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 3 independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: After 7 days, NP68 peptide (20 nM) and CpG ODN 1826 (2 mg/mL, InvivoGen, tlrl-1826) were added to the BMDC and cultured overnight before being washed and used for CD8 + T cells activation.

    Techniques: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, MANN-WHITNEY

    Tum-CD8 + memory cells display altered cytokine production but not cytotoxic capacities compared to Vir-CD8 + memory cells Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A and B) At 30 dpi, F5 memory cells were restimulated with NP68 (10 nM) for 4h in the presence of GolgiStop. The production of IFNγ, TNF, and IL-2 was measured by flow cytometry and expressed in % of total F5 (A) or MFI within the cytokine+ cells (B). (C and D) At 30 dpi, F5 memory cells were restimulated with NP68 (10 nM) for 4h in the presence (cytokines) or absence (CD69) of GolgiStop. The production of IFNγ and TNF and the upregulation of CD69 were measured by flow cytometry over time and expressed in % (C) or MFI (D). (E) The production of IFNγ was measured in supernatant after 4 or 24h of stimulation. (F and G) At 30 dpi, F5 memory cells were restimulated with various doses of NP68 for 4h in the presence of GolgiStop, and the production of IFNγ and TNF was measured by flow cytometry (F). EC 50 was determined (G). (H and I) Splenocytes were incubated with NP68 (10 nM) or control medium for 2h and labeled with CTV or CFSE, respectively. A 1:1 ratio of NP68-loaded splenocytes: control splenocytes (2.10 6 cells) was injected i.v. in Tum-CD8 + or Vir-CD8 + challenged mice at the memory stage. Representative histograms depicting control and CTV-labeled NP68-loaded splenocytes are shown (H). The percentage of NP68-loaded splenocytes killed was evaluated at 6-, 16-, or 44-h post-transfer (I). (J)Total CD8 + enriched from Tum-CD8 + or Vir-CD8 + challenged mice were labeled with CTV and stimulated with NP68-loaded DCs (1:1 ratio) for 4 days in the presence of IL-2. The expansion index of F5 cells was determined after 4 days. The statistical significance of differences was determined using 2-way ANOVA (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.0001). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 3 independent (A–G) or 1 (H–J) experiment(s).

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Transient tumor exposure induces persistent functional defects in memory CD8 + T cells

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115556

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Tum-CD8 + memory cells display altered cytokine production but not cytotoxic capacities compared to Vir-CD8 + memory cells Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A and B) At 30 dpi, F5 memory cells were restimulated with NP68 (10 nM) for 4h in the presence of GolgiStop. The production of IFNγ, TNF, and IL-2 was measured by flow cytometry and expressed in % of total F5 (A) or MFI within the cytokine+ cells (B). (C and D) At 30 dpi, F5 memory cells were restimulated with NP68 (10 nM) for 4h in the presence (cytokines) or absence (CD69) of GolgiStop. The production of IFNγ and TNF and the upregulation of CD69 were measured by flow cytometry over time and expressed in % (C) or MFI (D). (E) The production of IFNγ was measured in supernatant after 4 or 24h of stimulation. (F and G) At 30 dpi, F5 memory cells were restimulated with various doses of NP68 for 4h in the presence of GolgiStop, and the production of IFNγ and TNF was measured by flow cytometry (F). EC 50 was determined (G). (H and I) Splenocytes were incubated with NP68 (10 nM) or control medium for 2h and labeled with CTV or CFSE, respectively. A 1:1 ratio of NP68-loaded splenocytes: control splenocytes (2.10 6 cells) was injected i.v. in Tum-CD8 + or Vir-CD8 + challenged mice at the memory stage. Representative histograms depicting control and CTV-labeled NP68-loaded splenocytes are shown (H). The percentage of NP68-loaded splenocytes killed was evaluated at 6-, 16-, or 44-h post-transfer (I). (J)Total CD8 + enriched from Tum-CD8 + or Vir-CD8 + challenged mice were labeled with CTV and stimulated with NP68-loaded DCs (1:1 ratio) for 4 days in the presence of IL-2. The expansion index of F5 cells was determined after 4 days. The statistical significance of differences was determined using 2-way ANOVA (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.0001). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 3 independent (A–G) or 1 (H–J) experiment(s).

    Article Snippet: After 7 days, NP68 peptide (20 nM) and CpG ODN 1826 (2 mg/mL, InvivoGen, tlrl-1826) were added to the BMDC and cultured overnight before being washed and used for CD8 + T cells activation.

    Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Incubation, Control, Labeling, Injection

    A transient tumoral challenge is sufficient to alter the protection capacity of F5 memory cells Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A–D) At 30 dpi, Vir- or Tum-challenged mice were infected with VV-NP68 (2.10 5 pfu). Six days after infection, mice received an i.v. injection of anti-CD8 antibody, and the proportion of cells within the tissue and the vasculature of the lung was determined (A). The proportion of memory CD8 + T cells in the lung tissue among all memory CD8 + T cells was determined (B). The expression of CD49a (C) and CD49d (D) was measured on memory CD8 + T cells within the lung tissue and vasculature. (E) At 30 dpi, Vir- or Tum-challenged mice were infected with Flu-NP68 (5.10 4 TCID50), and the weight loss was followed for 6 days. (F) At 30 dpi, Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + memory cells were FACS-sorted and transferred into B6 host (1,2.10 5 cells, i.v. route). One day after transfer, mice received a lethal dose of Flu-NP68 (2.10 6 TCID 50), and survival was followed for 10 days. The statistical significance of differences was determined with 1-way (B) or 2-way (C–E) ANOVA test (∗ p > 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001), or log rank test (F). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 2 (A–D, and G) or 1 (E and F) experiment(s).

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Transient tumor exposure induces persistent functional defects in memory CD8 + T cells

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115556

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A transient tumoral challenge is sufficient to alter the protection capacity of F5 memory cells Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). (A–D) At 30 dpi, Vir- or Tum-challenged mice were infected with VV-NP68 (2.10 5 pfu). Six days after infection, mice received an i.v. injection of anti-CD8 antibody, and the proportion of cells within the tissue and the vasculature of the lung was determined (A). The proportion of memory CD8 + T cells in the lung tissue among all memory CD8 + T cells was determined (B). The expression of CD49a (C) and CD49d (D) was measured on memory CD8 + T cells within the lung tissue and vasculature. (E) At 30 dpi, Vir- or Tum-challenged mice were infected with Flu-NP68 (5.10 4 TCID50), and the weight loss was followed for 6 days. (F) At 30 dpi, Vir-CD8 + and Tum-CD8 + memory cells were FACS-sorted and transferred into B6 host (1,2.10 5 cells, i.v. route). One day after transfer, mice received a lethal dose of Flu-NP68 (2.10 6 TCID 50), and survival was followed for 10 days. The statistical significance of differences was determined with 1-way (B) or 2-way (C–E) ANOVA test (∗ p > 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001), or log rank test (F). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 2 (A–D, and G) or 1 (E and F) experiment(s).

    Article Snippet: After 7 days, NP68 peptide (20 nM) and CpG ODN 1826 (2 mg/mL, InvivoGen, tlrl-1826) were added to the BMDC and cultured overnight before being washed and used for CD8 + T cells activation.

    Techniques: Infection, Injection, Expressing

    Phenotype and cytokine production capacity of F5 memory cells is conserved after homologous or heterologous recall (A) Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). At 26 dpi, mice received a second immunization with VV-NP68 or EL4-NP68. (B) Thirty-one days post-recall, the number of F5 cells was measured in the spleen. (C) The expression of CD9, CD43, CD49a, and CD49d was measured on F5 memory cells 31 days after recall by flow cytometry. (D and E) Splenocytes were stimulated with NP68 (10 nM) for 4h in the presence (D) or absence (E) of GolgiStop. (D) The production of IFNγ, TFNα, and IL-2 was measured by flow cytometry. (E) The expression of PD-1 and TIM3 on F5 memory cells was determined in the spleen. The statistical significance of differences was determined with 1-way (B and C) or 2-way (D and E) ANOVA test (∗ p > 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 2 independent experiments.

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: Transient tumor exposure induces persistent functional defects in memory CD8 + T cells

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115556

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Phenotype and cytokine production capacity of F5 memory cells is conserved after homologous or heterologous recall (A) Naive F5 x CD45.1 cells (2.10 5 ) were i.v. transferred in B6 mice 1-day prior immunization with VV-NP68 (i.n., 2.10 5 pfu) or EL4-NP68 cells (s.c., 2,5.10 6 cells). At 26 dpi, mice received a second immunization with VV-NP68 or EL4-NP68. (B) Thirty-one days post-recall, the number of F5 cells was measured in the spleen. (C) The expression of CD9, CD43, CD49a, and CD49d was measured on F5 memory cells 31 days after recall by flow cytometry. (D and E) Splenocytes were stimulated with NP68 (10 nM) for 4h in the presence (D) or absence (E) of GolgiStop. (D) The production of IFNγ, TFNα, and IL-2 was measured by flow cytometry. (E) The expression of PD-1 and TIM3 on F5 memory cells was determined in the spleen. The statistical significance of differences was determined with 1-way (B and C) or 2-way (D and E) ANOVA test (∗ p > 0.05, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001). Data are represented as mean ± SD ( n = 5 mice per group) and are representative of 2 independent experiments.

    Article Snippet: After 7 days, NP68 peptide (20 nM) and CpG ODN 1826 (2 mg/mL, InvivoGen, tlrl-1826) were added to the BMDC and cultured overnight before being washed and used for CD8 + T cells activation.

    Techniques: Expressing, Flow Cytometry

    Journal: Immunity

    Article Title: PIP5 Kinases Regulate Membrane Phosphoinositide and Actin Composition for Targeted Granule Secretion by Cytotoxic Lymphocytes

    doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.017

    Figure Lengend Snippet:

    Article Snippet: ASNENMDAM (NP68 peptide 366-374) , Anaspec , AS-60623.

    Techniques: Blocking Assay, Control, Virus, Recombinant, Electron Microscopy, Fractionation, Software

    CD8 T lymphocytes from TCR-Tg F5 mice were stimulated with NP68 peptide in the absence or presence of Treg cells. Tregs were purified from spleens of untreated or GX15-070-treated C57BL/6 mice. Proliferation of CD8 cells was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation. CD4+/CD25+/FoxP3+ phenotype of Tregs was confirmed by flow cytometry.

    Journal:

    Article Title: Effect of a Small Molecule BCL-2 Inhibitor on Immune Function and Use with a Recombinant Vaccine

    doi: 10.1002/ijc.25177

    Figure Lengend Snippet: CD8 T lymphocytes from TCR-Tg F5 mice were stimulated with NP68 peptide in the absence or presence of Treg cells. Tregs were purified from spleens of untreated or GX15-070-treated C57BL/6 mice. Proliferation of CD8 cells was measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation. CD4+/CD25+/FoxP3+ phenotype of Tregs was confirmed by flow cytometry.

    Article Snippet: Cells were cultured for three days in complete CTL medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin) enriched with 10 −4 µg/mL of F5 TCR 366 ASNENMDAM 374 ligand peptide 68 (NP68) (American Peptide Company Inc., Sunnyvale, CA).

    Techniques: Purification, Flow Cytometry